If you’re an Aussie this plate of crap is gonna cost you more.
We all know European descent people are not “ethnic.” As such, we are naturally the oppressor and all our actions come under scrutiny by the PC Police and the authoritarian State. We do not seem to meet the dictionary description of “ethnic” simply because when we display signs of “pertaining to or characteristic of a people, especially a group (ethnic group) sharing a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like,” it’s racist.
Not so when other ethnic groups do this. Case in point, a tiny story out of Australia about a Chinese restaurant that has two menus, one for Chinese peeps and one for everyone else. Naturally, the prices are more than 12 percent higher on the Anglo menu. The Anglo menu is black while the Chinese menu, is, naturally, red.
The Chinese restaurant workers and owners also naturally deny this is going on, even though looking at the menus’ pricing is proof enough. It’s easy to deny what is in front of your face when you belong to an ethnic minority. They may also use the excuse of not speaking English so they can’t possibly know what’s actually going on in their own restaurant.
Okay, now, let me point out that having traveled extensively ’round the world I of know that menus in tourist restaurants often have one menu for tourists and the other for locals with different prices. Not all restaurants, of course, but some. I also know this same practice goes on in Chinatown, what’s left of it, in New York City and San Francisco.
The problem is not with giving different prices to different people. I guess if you are a private business and you want to charge different prices to different customers that’s okay. What’s not okay is that is the Anglos did this to the Chinese people, if the situation was reversed, then it would be a hate crime. That’s what bugs me about this.
That’s what is so horrible about mass immigration from third world into the first world – that tribal instinct is completely acceptable under the State Religion of Diversity and Multiculturalism. That grip who invades the first world is also a victim, even though they are an aggressor. So the rules simply do not apply to them. The rules only apply to the Anglo “oppressors” meaning that we can be discriminated against to any extent and it is sanctioned by the State.
This sort of ethnic loyalty at a restaurant may seem trivial but it is a sign of a deteriorating civilization, Western civilization. Yes, I know, Chinese are super smart and they are the “good immigrants.” Not necessarily, and do you really want to import yet another overclass? The oppressive laws of the State apply only to law abiding citizens, and the lawless behavior of the invader is condoned within the State’s own anarchy against it’s own people. And yes, I am channeling Sam Francis.